Hamill was so ripped off. The UFC should investigate the judges. If they just let this sit, they should be compared to some of boxing’s worst. I am sure they will do something.

Micheal Bisping recently sat down with Kevin Iole of YAHOO! Sports to look back on his behavior after winning one of the most controversial decisions in UFC history. He also sheds new insight into why he acted the way he did during the news conference. Here are some of the highlights of that conversation.

Bisping On Whether He Won The Fight Or Not:

“Even a very good friend of mine, that night, he came up to me and said, ‘You know mate, to be honest, I think you lost that fight,’ ” Bisping said. “Of course I care what people think, especially because I’m not that kind of a guy,” Bisping said. “If you read the Internet message boards after that fight, I think I was more hated than Saddam Hussein. “If I had a time machine, I’d go back in time and handle myself a lot differently than I did. Of course I felt I won the fight, but I had no business reacting to the journalists the way I did.”

Bisping’s Dire Situation Right Before The News Conference:

What many did not know however, was that Bisping was dealing with a dire situation minutes before his furious, emotion-laced reaction to journalists inquiring about the judges decision.

Jan Bisping, Micheal’s father, placed a desperate call to Micheal for help. It seems Jan was being harassed by angry fans outside the London’s O2 Arena. Micheal was quickly whisked away with security on the back of a moped in search of his father. Unfortunately Micheal had no luck finding him before having to head back reluctantly to the UFC’s mandatory news conference. Friends assured him that they’d find his father.

“No excuses,” Bisping said, “but look at what happened before I walked into that room from my perspective. My adrenaline was still moving fairly well from the fight. I’m hot and sweaty and concerned about my father. And all of a sudden I’m getting negative comments. “I handled myself badly – I’m the first to admit that – but everything combined at that point and I just kind of had an eruption.” Bisping On His Fight With Rashad Evans:

“I’ve got a lot of incentive in this fight. I want to change people’s minds, not only about how I acted, but about how I fought. If people didn’t like what they saw the last time, I ask them to give me one more chance. I promise they’re going to get what they want to see.”

Bisping was not the same before that fight, I know none of you will care but I gotta feel bad for the guy!

When baseball went on strike in the 90’s, I said that I would do my part to punish the greedy players and owners by ignoring them. I have kept my word.

But I’m not ignoring the UFC to punish them by withdrawing my support, I just don’t have any interest, my balloon’s deflated after this bullshit. UFC is bogus to me now, and I won’t change my mind. Too bad, because before this fight my enthusiasm was very high, I was preaching their gospel.

I won’t stop watching mixed martial arts… I just won’t watch or support the UFC.

were on the same page then, im not trying to start anything and im to young to get into UFC to. i was just stating my poinion like yours, i felt as though you were attacking me personally, and i dont agree with your opinion but i will respect it, your the only one here still going for bisping. i remember the gonzaga couture fight, i was going for couture, in a Hooters in charlotte North Carolina. i was the only one goin for gonzaga, but that didnt stop me from cheering for him, and also i had forty dollars onthe fight. but afterwards i thought i was going to get into a shit storm of fights, but i started talking with some guys that pointed me out, i expressed my opinion and we we’re all cool. we chill some. so i know exactly where your coming from, but you gotta accept that everyone is gonna claim hamill, even me.

Ok I understand we are cool but read this man looks like somebody does agree with me.

i brought that up because most people just comment and dont know what there saying, i brought it up because i wanted to show people that i actually know fighting and i gave the reasons that i thought he won, because i’ve trained for this. your trying to start something immaturally with me, and i never brought you into the conversation. thats little kid shit trying to talk shit online, this is a debate practically and understand that you’ve heard Hamill won athousand times, but if all these people are saying it then why dont you accept the truth. if you do MMA then you should have seen that hamill won.

I have not fought yet because I am too young to fight, Im as sick of this as you are and I wasnt trying to start an argument but all of these people need to accept thats my opinion and whether you agree with me or not it doesnt matter because we have no control over what they are talking about!

i train in MMA, and i want to be a professional MMA fighter and have a contract with a league by the age 24. needless to say i probably know more about fighting than anyone who is on here, and there may be exceptions. But lets face facts, Hamill had ring control the whole fight, he pushed the pace the whole time, he landed more shots and more important shots, and he had allot more takedowns. hamill won the first two rounds and arguably the third. so fuck bisping, that shit talking bitch.

I train mma and have done with vitor,ross pointon and many other mma fighters but do you see ME mouthing off about knowing more mma than the next guy. BOTTOM LINE everybody is saying Hamill won, I cant tell you how many times ive heard that today, but boo hoo the rematch is upon us. BTW whats the point of moaning about something you have no control over!

WOW…, P-Face, You really told me…, Whooo, PUNK you say. That reminds me of school days when some person would be getting the worst end of an exchange and they would fire back with “your mom”.

That was mostly the big mouth talkers who fired with their lips…, ya’ll all know the kind.

As far as the Judges…, I don’t care why they GAVE the win to Bisping…, the fact is, in my mind, they GAVE the win to him; you can think whatever you want but I’ll foever more say the two judges GAVE the fight to Bisping.

They made a good fight and they will do it again. If I was Hamill I would not LET Bisping up after the takedown. I would mall Bisping on the ground the R.C. way. If Hamill does that he will not give the Judges any room to steal the win from him.

As far as the punk comment you made…, well it was just that, a punk comment.

~ReddOne

Here’s a snip from Peoples:

“I gave Bisping the second round, first because Hamill was beginning to run out of gas after the first round. Bisping fought like he wanted that fight. He came back aggressive [from the first round]. Hamill did take him down, but he did nothing with the takedown. Overall, Bisping was more aggressive. Hamill just held him down. Bisping’s punching was more effective.”

Convinced now punk!

What a joke for the UFC/WWE! Is this turning out to be the new WWE?Should we call Dana White - Dana McMann?

Its not Danas fault he is trying to get a rematch between them both so all of you just STFU about Bisping because he will win the rematch. BTW here is the link.

http://ufcmania.com/2007/09/10/michael-bisping-matt-hamill-rematch-im-going-to-be-on-it-right-away-says-dana-white/

~FROM: Pie Face
Sep 9th, 2007 at 1:47 pm Quote
” HELD HIS OWN OMFG he did just about nothing in round 2 and lost round 3 it was close but he lost and it sure as hell was NOT A 10/8 ROUND.”

I said round ONE (1) Hamill dominate Bisping and that I saw it as a 10/8 round. Won round two 10/9, and held his own in round three.

Even IF…, IF…, Hamill lost round three he still should have won on points.

Control of the Octagon earns points! Running backward away from the aggressor dosen’t earn points. Hamill was the aggreeeor for the entire fight. He held the center of the ring for at least 90% of the fight.

Controling a fighter on the ground earn points. You can call it “lay and pray” or enything you want but it earns points. Or at least real judges score it that way.

~ReddOne

Punches count for points aswell and Bisping landed loads in late round 2 and round 3.

I said round ONE (1) Hamill dominate Bisping and that I saw it as a 10/8 round. Won round two 10/9, and held his own in round three.

Even IF…, IF…, Hamill lost round three he still should have won on points.

Control of the Octagon earns points! Running backward away from the aggressor dosen’t earn points. Hamill was the aggreeeor for the entire fight. He held the center of the ring for at least 90% of the fight.

Controling a fighter on the ground earn points. You can call it “lay and pray” or enything you want but it earns points. Or at least real judges score it that way.

~ReddOne

Well spoken Tracy…, 100% agreed. ;)

~ReddOne